Tenants Raise Concerns Over Constant Monitoring And Unseen Authority
Occupants of a sealed shared house have described round-the-clock observation, no external contact, and instructions delivered by a disembodied voice as a living arrangement they consider broadly reasonable.
News Intro
A group of tenants sharing a single self-contained residence have raised concerns about the conditions of their accommodation, citing continuous filming in every room, no means of contacting anyone outside the property, and a central authority that communicates with them exclusively through a speaker in the ceiling.
The residence, which the occupants are not permitted to leave, is fitted with cameras in all common areas, the bedrooms, the garden, and the bathroom. Tenants report that they are observed at all hours, including while sleeping, and that microphones capture every conversation held within the perimeter walls.
Instructions are issued by an unseen figure the residents refer to only by a title. The figure does not appear in person, is never seen, and communicates by summoning individual tenants, one at a time, into a separate room containing a single chair, where they are addressed directly and expected to respond.
Despite this, the occupants describe the arrangement as one they entered willingly and continue to regard as fair.
A Tenant's Account
Settling in, under observation
There has been a lot said about the house, and not all of it by people who have actually lived in it.
It is a lovely house. Big kitchen, garden, sofas, the lot. We all live together, which I love, because I am a real people person and the cameras have really brought that out in me.
Yes, there are cameras. There are cameras in every room. I know how that sounds, but you stop noticing them after the first day, which I think proves they are not a problem. They are behind the mirrors, mostly, so really you are just looking at yourself, which I find quite grounding.
We cannot leave, but I would not want to leave, so that has never come up for me personally as an issue.
There is a voice. The voice lives in the ceiling and tells us what to do, and when the voice wants a private word it calls your name and you go and sit in the chair in the special room and answer the questions. I find these chats really helpful. The voice is firm but fair. The voice has never once told me its name, which I respect, because it shows the voice is not in it for the attention, unlike some people in here.
Sometimes the voice asks us to wear costumes, or to stand on one leg for the afternoon, or to nominate which of our friends should be removed from the house permanently. We do this in private, in the chair, which I think is the decent way to handle it.
The voice does control the hot water, the doors, the shopping budget, and whether we are allowed to speak to each other at certain hours, but it controls these things on our behalf, so it is really a kind of help.
Honestly, I have never felt more free.
Housing Review
Taken as a tenancy, this fails almost every test we would normally apply. The occupants cannot come and go, cannot contact the outside world, and are filmed in spaces — bedrooms, bathrooms — where any reasonable person retains an expectation of privacy regardless of what they signed. The detail that troubles me most is the mechanism of removal. Tenants are asked, in private, to nominate which of their fellow residents should be evicted, and an unnamed authority then enforces that. You have outsourced the eviction process to the tenants themselves and removed the landlord's name from every document. That is not a housing arrangement. It is a structure designed so that no one is ever identifiably responsible for anything that happens inside it.
What strikes me is the speed with which the residents have reframed total observation as intimacy. "It has brought out my people-person side." "The chats are helpful." This is the language of someone adapting to constant scrutiny by deciding it must be a form of care. The nominations are the revealing part. They are asked to privately select friends for removal, then return to the group and behave as though nothing has happened. A normal household could not sustain that for a week. They have sustained it by agreeing, collectively, not to mention the ceiling.
From a loss-adjustment standpoint the property itself is a nightmare. You have a fully enclosed dwelling, no external egress, occupants who cannot leave in the event of an incident, and a single controlling party operating the doors, the utilities, and the lighting remotely. Add costumes, group tasks, and a population under sustained psychological pressure, and you have a claims profile I would frankly decline to write. The cameras would at least give us very thorough footage, which is the only column on the form that comes back positive.
Resident Forum
u/Behind_The_Mirror_88 · 29455 points · 6h ago
"You stop noticing the cameras after the first day, which proves they are not a problem" is the most efficient description of how surveillance actually works that I have ever read.
u/Nominated_Again_07 · 24180 points · 6h ago
INFO: when the voice asks you to privately name a friend for eviction, at what point in that conversation does it feel fair
u/Diary_Room_Chair_41 · 20733 points · 6h ago
The bit where it controls the hot water, the doors, the food budget and whether you're allowed to talk to each other, and the conclusion is "so it's really a kind of help." I need to sit down.
u/Ceiling_Speaks_233 · 17688 points · 6h ago
"The voice has never told me its name, which I respect" is doing an unbelievable amount of work to avoid the obvious follow-up question.
u/Garden_Tasks_19 · 14021 points · 6h ago
Never felt more free. Cannot open a door. Both things he said in the same post.
Community Poll
Community Poll
Latest reader breakdown
Is this a reasonable tenancy?